Lifestyle, Mental Health

Kristina Cohen & Our Roles as Spectators

I don’t usually post twice in a day, but I’m incensed. So, here we go.

TRIGGER/CONTENT WARNINGS: rape, sexual assault/abuse, gaslighting, and rape culture; cancer is mentioned in the first link

Dear Spectators,

This age we live in allows for news to travel with the click of a button. This quick sharing means that the distance from a big celebrity to me isn’t that great. We’re almost live-streaming scandal at this point. Social media, digital news outlets, “outing”, and endless feminist struggles paved the way for Weinstein to finally be brought down. (Not that his downfall is complete.) And now, other sexual predators are toppling.

Yesterday, yet another rapist was outed. In case you missed it, Kristina Cohen accused Ed Westwick of raping her three years ago. As soon as the post and following articles popped up, the onslaught of total bullshit began: “Why didn’t she speak out sooner?” and “She’s making it up for money” and “[crying emoji] [heartbreak emoji]” and “Not Chuck Bass!!1!” If people weren’t tearing down Cohen, they were crying about Westwick.

I’m not going to get into blaming survivors for not speaking out or why survivors don’t give a shit about their abusers’ money. If you think rape survivors would, after years of gaslighting and trauma, finally speak out about their abuse just for money or attention — get the hell away from me and do some reading. (And don’t @ me with “It’s happened before!!” because, yeah Chadbro Lite, I get that. There are over 7 billion people on the planet. All outcomes are possible. The likelihood that someone is lying about this? Slim.)

What I do want to talk to you about, fellow spectator, is mourning the rapist.

While I know that the world of media consumption is complex — the bigger the rapist’s portfolio, the harder the fall for them and the harder the separation of creator/product for us — I also know that you should refocus your attentions.

Every time you tweet “Not Ed Westwick! 😭“, Kristina Cohen’s name gets smaller and smaller. Her agency diminishes. Her voice wanes. Your support goes from “active survivor support” to “passive rapist support”. Why? Because you care more about what you’re losing than what Cohen went through.

I know you can feel more than one thing at a time. You can feel horror and disgust and rage for Kristina Cohen, while also feeling bummed out that you can no longer ogle Chuck Bass without feeling sick. I know that. I feel the same way. How we handle those feelings is important.

Tweeting about Westwick, Gossip Girl, Chuck Bass — whatever — with sad faces and “not another one” literally gives Westwick the numbers. But Westwick already has the numbers. He comes with them. Though he hasn’t done anything worthwhile since Gossip Girl (which ended in 2012), he has a huge fan base. Kristina Cohen does not have the fan base to back her, to support her, to defend her when morons claim she must be making all of this up for money. And instead of focusing your efforts on boosting a survivor’s voice, you’re cry-emoji-ing about an otherwise-irrelevant rapist.

And Kristina Cohen speaking out is not about you and your loss. 

When a survivor speaks out, it is to help other survivors and to maybe bring justice to those who have been abusing their power and violating other human beings. If you are neither a survivor nor a rapist, your job is to listen to the survivor. If you feel so inclined, share the survivor’s words with others that way their message spreads. There is strength in numbers. For many survivors, the numbers are (and, therefore, the support is) small; the rapists have the numbers, the power, the benefit of the doubt. Your tweeted expression of loss tells other survivors that you care more about yourself than what they’re saying.

As spectators, we have to struggle with the aftermath of an outing. A lot of us loved Gossip Girl and loved Chuck Bass (despite the fact that he tried to rape Jenny Humphrey). Do we never re-watch Gossip Girl? Do we never re-watch… well, whatever else Westwick’s been in? (Seriously, guys, the amount of crying emojis I saw on Twitter today are laughable because Westwick has had 0 relevancy in 5 years.) That’s up to you. I’m not going to judge you for watching Gossip Girl or Weinstein’s old films. I’ll deal with my feelings about rapists’ products in private, maybe eventually share my conclusions publicly. For now, I’m going to be busy supporting survivors and raising their voices because they’re more important and shouldn’t be drowned out.

I hope this post gave you something to think about in terms of how we present our thoughts and the consequences of our 140-character tweets.

Sincerely,
A Spectator

P.S. I know Westwick has denied the claims. I don’t really care.


You can also find me on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and Goodreads. 💗
NEW: I have a Ko-fi account! I would super appreciate any donations toward
my chai lattes, Jonny’s chocolates, Ella’s cat toys, and Alfred’s crickets. 💑🐱🐸

12 thoughts on “Kristina Cohen & Our Roles as Spectators”

  1. This is such an important topic and you discussed is so eloquently. I think that it’s important that we stop and take the time to consider how our reaction can have an impact on the overall situation, and on what the survivor is feeling and dealing with at the time. Thank you for speaking up!
    Britt | http://alternativelyspeaking.ca

    Liked by 1 person

  2. THIS THIS THIS. When I first saw his name trending, I thought maybe he’d released a new film or something and then I saw what it was about . . . but the responses were VILE. I’m all for “innocent until proven guilty” and not wanting to condemn him yet but attacking her is disgusting. the percentage of women that lie about sexual harassment is SO low and she’s hardly got anything to gain from the accussation xx

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Totally! I only heard about it because a few people I followed on Twitter were saying things like “Not Ed too! :(” So I was like… what happened? But yeah, the percentage of r*pe accusations that are false is between 1-10%, that’s a 1/10 chance (or less!) that she’s lying. There’s just no point in falsely accusing someone — she has nothing to gain and he has nothing to lose from a false accusation.

      Thanks for commenting. ❤ x

      Like

  3. Excellent piece, Kaiya. It’s always a shitstorm whenever a survivor comes forth with their story against a powerful person. This is a great way to explain shifting the focus back to the survivor (sorry, I hate calling these people victims) and their bravery in coming forward.

    I like that you addressed the questions that people have when it came to supporting rapists’ products that one has supported prior to the allegations. I was having that same discussion with my boyfriend about this in regards to the Weinstein scandal. We both decided that when it comes to media we consumed naive to the scandals, we can’t help the way we initially felt about said media nor can we get back the money we spent seeing said media. I know I was in this same rut when I first watched “Midnight in Paris” (by our certain fave English teacher’s recommendation) and then learned that Woody Allen was a gross pedophile. I can’t unlike a film I saw but I can go out of my way not to support any of his other projects (and I haven’t seen a Woody Allen film since my first time watching MIP).

    The biggest thing to do is to push forward and not support these abusers or those that support them in any capacity. So for us, that means avoiding supporting films associated with the Weinstein company, avoiding projects that still have Kevin Spacey attached to them, and the like. I’d even go as far as to say not to re-watch their projects on services that can still financially support them. It’s a super small thing that can take up time in the future, but I think it’s important to really be mindful of stuff that affects an abuser’s power: their profession and their money which are the things that gives them power.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. I’m going to go through and change “victim” to “survivor” in most/all cases because I agree with you. The word “victim” is still taking away the survivor’s agency. Thank you for bringing it to my attention. x

      I also agree with your way of taking support away from abusers. Hitting them in the pockets (even weakly as our 1 in however-many-million pennies allow) seems to be the way to go. For me, re-watching a lot of these things is hard anyway because I feel physically sick and unable to stop thinking about who is behind what I’m viewing. While there were a few Weinstein movies here and there that I liked, the only one I’ve seen more than once was Shakespeare in Love (I’m weak). However, I know that people have different tastes, so far be it from me to take away another person’s attachments.

      Less seriously… I didn’t like Midnight in Paris, and I can’t even remember why because I watched it so long ago. 😡

      Liked by 1 person

    2. Yeah, this is definitely me with my Quentin Tarantino films. I know he didn’t do anything but that’s it – stuff was happening and he didn’t really DO anything. That’s the only one I feel bummed out about. I’ve been pretty good at avoiding all of the others. The only movies I bother watching in the theater are superhero ones now.

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s